" adhere to its principles and make
regulations, such regula:
"vimilar.
" how will not, in practice, "effectively enforced by
"
淼
Be
sove of
" Auch nations, and that, therefore,
the effect will be to main or hill
"the British
carrying
trade as re=
"-gards Chinese passengers from "some of
the Coast ports and kaus: " for it to the ships of China and "other countries whose consular pe=
" presentatives are less scrupulous and " mergetic
than the British Conville
"at the various
vario
o port.
The letter of the China Associ. ation shows that my forecast of strong opposition was accurate. I am, however, unable to see in what respect clauses 2 and 11 of the Bill conflict. In referring to clause 11, the writer hav omitted the word "not before the
word
le and
applicable
appears, therefore,
to have misunderstood the section; and
a
bo
regards the criticism of clause 2 the definition of Chinese Passenger ship pemains the sauce as it has been
since
the Quiness Pussargers
Inssengers Act 1855,
nor do Sow hows
a 2
ship from any
Japanese port to Hong Kong would cave within that definition.
540
I have endeavoured, to the
best of my ability, to carry out the instructions I received to prepare the
of
draft of the Ordinance in accordance with the requirements
the despatch N. 17 from the Marquess of Ripon dated the 24th January 1895. My opinion
as to whether such an Ordinance was. required d was not asked and that is
a matter which I, accordingly, leave
for others to decide.
4.
anney A
copy of the notes upon the Ordinance which I'appended
ه کر
my previous minute, and I trust that the Regulations though less ebingand " than the rules which under the existing
"law
No comments yet.
Private notes are available after approval.